But first, a small semantic definition- It was Joseph Nye, who coined this term in his book, which contrasts the use of power of attraction vs the carrots and sticks based notion of hard power. In my assessment, China has done the following 3 things:
- As I watched Boris Johnson, the mayor of London take the flag in the closing ceremony, I could not but help think that China was at that point in time, very much a part of the global community- as compared to perhaps a sense of "them" vs "us" that seems to permeate some of the other conversations that include the Chinese (global trade talks, the credit crunch, the dollar weakness etc).
- In setting the new benchmark for how this event should be run, the rest of the world now has a viable and a valid powerhouse to emulate- if there was ever a coming out party for the Chinese, this was it, and what a grand party it was!
- The power of Sport as a unifier is perhaps another "soft power" force that has worked very well for the Chinese. Be it in swimming, or gymnastics or athletics, the sheer beauty of superlative performance leaves us breathless, regardless of the gender or the race of the one delivering this performance. And this event has given many of us beautiful moments to cherish.
I have articulated elsewhere that I am a big believer in the power of attraction as a way to increase brand relevance, and in the aftermath of the Olympics, the Chinese have a great tail-wind to consolidate on the goodwill and the attraction they induced in the rest of the world- will they be able to leverage this to get to the next highs in their prosperity?